Etabs Shell thick thin layer & Membrance Difference
Thin vs. Thick
What is the difference between thin and thick shell formulations?
The inclusion of transverse shear deformation in plate-bending behavior is the main difference between thin and thick shell formulation. Thin-plate formulation follows a Kirchhoff application, which neglects transverse shear deformation, whereas thick-plate formulation follows Mindlin/Reissner, which does account for shear behavior. The thick-plate formulation has no effect upon membrane (in-plane) behavior, only plate-bending (out-of-plane) behavior.
#if You Like Please Click on Ads Shown on the website page#
Shear deformation tends to be important when shell thickness is greater than approximately 1/5 to 1/10 of the span of plate-bending curvature. Shearing may also become significant in locations of bending-stress concentrations, which occur near sudden changes in thickness or support conditions, and near openings or re-entrant corners. The thick-plate formulation is best for such applications.
The thick-plate formulation is also recommended in general because it tends to be more accurate, though slightly stiffer, even for thin-plate bending problems in which shear deformation is truly negligible. However, the accuracy of the thick-plate formulation is sensitive to mesh distortion and large aspect ratios, and therefore should not be used in such cases when shear deformation is known to be small.
In general, the contribution of shear deformation becomes significant when the ratio between the span of plate-bending curvature and thickness is approximately 20:1 or 10:1. The formulation itself is adequate for ratio down to 5:1 or 4:1. In that this ratio is dependent upon the projected span of curvature, shell thickness may be greater than the actual plan dimensions of a shell object.